Friday, July 3, 2026

Rainy reads

We've been getting a lot of rain lately, so I've been reading more. I used to be able to dive into a book and I'd be gone. Not so much anymore, I recognize the plot and know how it will end, and the cardboard characters don't interest me. I'll stop reading. They might or might not show up here. Sometimes I use the blog as a way to remind myself if I've read something that catches my attention.

But first, a peony!

The Last Gifts of the Universe by Riley August. I thought it would be cute. It was not.


The Tallpecs of Alberta and Saskatchewan by Fred Stenson. I'd read another of his books and liked it. I did not like this one, mainly because the vertical distortion ruins the photos for me.


Canadian Photographs, by Geoffrey James. Exactly what it says.


Identity Theft by Robert J. Sawyer. He is one of the pre-eminent Canadian science fiction writers. I've actually met him and chatted at a writer's convention. I've got lots of his other books, and enjoyed them. I remember his saying once that he gets lots of offers to collaborate on books, with the person offering to share their idea, and help him with the writing. He always refuses because these people bring nothing to the table. Ideas are a dime a dozen. He said he had more ideas than he could write out in the rest of his life. It's the writing out that's the hard part. Tapping the keys, putting in the time to get it right, then send it out to the world. Even for established writers it's not easy. There's a joke. What is it that all writers want more than anything else? Answer. To have written. Anyway, this is pretty good, though I mostly saw the twist coming. Anybody that's read Varley's Steel Beach universe will also see it coming. There is a bit of a sense of cranking it out.


The Iconic Photographs by Steve McCurry. I can confidently state you've seen his work. Who can forget Afghan Girl once they've seen her eyes? I had to wait a while to get this one, and oh boy, is it worth the wait. This is absolutely stunning.


Why Buddhism is True, by Robert Wright. OMG, so many words going around in a circle.


Not at the End of the World by Hannah Ritchie. Oh so earnest. But Hans Rosling did it so much better.


The Silent Gondoliers by William Goldman. Sort of like The Princess Bride, but not as good.


I only Read Murder by Ian and Will Ferguson. It's gone back to the library, and I now have no memory of reading it.


Of the Day
Driftwood (NZ)


Driftwood (NB)


Film


Linda


Newfoundland


New Brunswick


Why ever didn't I publish this, and maybe I did


90 days, or so ago


Flower


Landscape
This is part of the "beach" at the end of the road in norther Newfoundland. I consider myself fortunate that I didn't twist an ankle walking on the slippery sloped rocks, and then fall over and bleed to death on the razor sharp rock edges. 


Serendipity


Thursday, July 2, 2026

June Image of the Month

This was a struggle. I started thinking about this well before the end of June. Of the ~2000 images only about 500 qualify for consideration. Race and WCA images don't count for this. Of the 500 or so, fewer than 200 were edited. Most of them are flowers and most of those are peonies. 

Yes, I love the peony photos. June 29 is a peak peony day, with only the red one still anticipating. Yes, you'll see them, be patient. The photos are nice, but are they image of the month? There's a couple rolls of long exposure film photos where what got captured isn't quite what my eyes saw, or what I hoped to get. Nice, maybe interesting, but image of the month? And really, does anyone care anymore that an image was created on film or digital? 

The macro photos might be a bit puzzling, technically difficult to do, and interesting in their own way, but image of the month? With all the rain I've been catching up on my reading and one of the photo books is an absolute banger, but does a photo of the cover rate image of the month? I think not.

Most of the images are essentially documentary. There I was, this is what I saw. I'd like to think that image of the month should be more than that. A few of the images seem to have a taste of that little extra. Or maybe not. Perhaps it's wishful thinking. Or maybe I'm just getting fussy in my old age. Another stroke of doom is coming up soon. I try not to think about it.

Anyways, enough dither. This, for whatever reason, is the one I keep coming back to and looking at. Make of it what you will.











Monday, June 29, 2026

Macro Monday

I was sorting out the table downstairs that is heaped with photo gear. Cameras, lenses, straps, batteries, cables, bags, and all sorts of other bits and bobs. I was looking for a small bag or pouch to carry some film specific gear, so I was also rooting through the piles of swag bags accumulated over the decades of work. A fanny pack is about the right size to carry the small notebook and pencil, filter cases in case I decide I don't want to use the ND filter,  a roll of film, and a small knife to get into the roll of film. (I have difficulty getting into small foil or plastic wrapped packages, and am still traumatized by the memory of failing to get into a package of cheese served on a flight from Toronto to Vancouver in the mid-60's or so.) I was experimenting with a fanny pack instead of pockets. I know that for me, I might go for a walk and not see anything, or I might get on a roll with wonderful light, and 8 photos per roll can go quickly.

Back to the mound on the table. I was sorting through and found the specialty macro lens and realized it's been a long time since I used it, and it's a specific kind of fun. I checked in with my friend Antje (of the Two Noir Detectives fame) to see if she'd like in on the fun. I wanted to experiment with the big shop lights and the copy stand used for digitizing film negatives to see how all that worked.

(Those familiar with macro photography can skip this digression and go right to the photos.) There are several challenges with macro photography; depth of field and getting enough light on the subject. The typical definition for macro photography is 1:1 or higher, meaning if your subject is 3 mm long (an ant for example) it will be captured as 3mm long on the sensor, and might be several cm long on your screen. The depth of field is extremely narrow, often less than 1mm. This means that part of the ant butt could be in focus, another part be slightly out of focus, and the rest of the ant is a total out of focus blur. At full extension the front element of the lens is only a few cm away from the subject, leading to the next problem, light. It's hard to get enough light to bounce off the subject, through the lens, and onto the sensor. The solution is to increase the ISO, leading to sensor noise, or increase the exposure time typically leading to a blurry subject because breathing on the camera will make it move, or the brute force solution of a more powerful light. This particular lens, the Canon MP-E 65mm 1-5x Macro only focuses by changing the magnification or the distance between the sensor and the subject, and don't forget the extremely shallow depth of field. Previously I used a jerry-rigged contraption of a bike stand and a tripod with a macro rail. I wanted to see if the copy stand offered fine enough control. It does, if you're careful and patient.

The LED work lights are unbelievably eye-ball searingly bright when looked at up close. We both had to take breaks a couple times because we glanced at the light, and all we could see for a moment were giant white spots. Even though the front of the light is cool, the back gets warm, and anything put directly on the light is going to get warm, so I was careful with heat. There were two approaches. One was to shine the light from the side, and the other was to lay the light on the copy stand pointing straight up, and put the subject on it. Having Antje made life much easier because sometimes you need 3 or 4 hands. One to tweak the camera height by tweaking the copy stand, one to adjust the lens magnification, one or two to ever so slightly tweak the position of the subject. It's easiest to start at 1:1, find the subject, and gradually magnify in, slightly moving the subject as required. You can't just centre it and zoom in because the stand is built on a bit of an angle.

Enough. On to the photos.
1. As you'll probably realize, most of these are fabric. You can't tell with any of them particularly, but you're looking at an area about 3 x 2 mm in these photos.


2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. Paper.

10.

11. A small charm.

12. A needle, and this was the toughest.

13. Part of a wax pencil.

14. Metal.

16.

17. A nearly invisible bit of fluff on a knife blade.

18.

19.

20A. 

20B.

After so many photos, I won't force you to look at more. The Of the Day feature will return, as will more peonies. It's been raining really hard this weekend, and it's still raining this morning, off and on, mostly on. I'm not going to be surprised to read about localized flooding here, but so far we are high and dry.


Friday, June 26, 2026

Flowery Friday 5, Peonies!

The anticipation is beginning to be over. One of the peonies is bursting out, and two others are starting to burst. I have to admit the others are still anticipating. It's going to be a good show this year. If any of you peony lovers want to come see them in person, I'm sure Linda would be happy to give you a tour. Or photo buddies, I've got some ideas about reflectors...

It's been a busy week. Nearly 2,000 photos, and that includes a roll of film. The bulk of that is from the race last weekend, plus several community association events. But there's flowers, some cloudscapes, and a fun macro day yesterday.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7. And just for fun, some peony photos from earlier this week, in light that wasn't as nice. The light makes a difference.


8.

9.

10. Not a peony, obviously.


Of the Day
Driftwood (NZ)


Driftwood (NB)


Film
A difficult exposure. Won't be trying to print this one.


Linda


Newfoundland


New Brunswick


Why ever didn't I publish this, and maybe I did


90 days, or so ago


Flower


Landscape
A golden Saskatchewan morning.


Serendipity
I was leaving a photo meetup put on by my buddy Neil Zeller, and saw this reflection.